STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN JURY

Ashraf M. Salama, Mohamed-Sherif T. El-Attar

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.104

Abstract

The jury system is a traditional architectural learning assessment tool. Since the early years of the 20th century, it has been imported to schools of architecture throughout the Arab world by foreign expatriates and native scholars educated in the United States and Europe. The system has been well documented through the study of its evolution, the analysis of its processes, and also was criticized heavily in the literature of the Western world. However, there appears to be a severe lack of research and documentation in this area in the Arab world. The purpose of this paper is to fill this informational gap and attempts to answer the questions of how jury practices are performed in the context of the Arab world and how students perceive the jury system and its underlying practices in such a context? In an attempt to answer these questions, a multilayered methodology is deployed. First, to induct generalities between the two contexts (Western and Arab) an extensive literature review is conducted on the educational value of the jury system and the embedded communication processes. Second, to deduct particularities concerning specific contexts of the Arab world, two empirical studies are carried out with the intention of investigating jury practices and student perceptions within the context of selected cases from Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The understanding and portrayal of the Jury system and its associated problems contribute to the development of a set of recommendations to improve the performance of the Jury and its acceptability to architecture students.


Keywords

Architectural education; design studio; architectural design jury; assessment; learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahrentzen, S., and Anthony, K. (1993). Sex, Stars, and Studios: A Look at Gendered Educational Practices in Architecture Journal of Architectural Education, 47(1), 11-29.

Al-Mogren, A. A. (2006). Architectural Learning: Evaluating the Work Environment and the Style of Teaching and Management in Design Studios. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 45(5), 1-14.

Anthony, K. (1987). Private Reactions to Public Criticism Journal of Architectural Education, 40(3), 2-11.

Anthony, K. (1991). Design Juries on Trial: The Renaissance of the Studio. New York USA.: Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY.

Anthony, K. (2002). Designing for Diversity: Implications for Architectural Education in the Twenty-first Century. Journal of Architectural Education, 55(4), 257-267.

Boyer, E. L., and Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: A new future for architectural education and practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Cameron, M. (2003). The Jury’s Out: A Critique of the Design Review in Architectural Education. Retrieved Dec. 11, 2007, from www.acuads.com.au/conf2003/papers_refereed/cameron.pdf

Carlhian, J. P. (1979). The ecole des beaux-arts. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(2).

Carlhian, J. P. (1980). History at the Ecole. Journal of Architectural Education, 34(3).

Chafee, R. (1977). The Teaching of Architecture at the Ecole Des Beaux-Arts. In The Architecture of the Ecole Des Beaux-Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dilnot, C., Krieger, A., Robbins, E., Saunders, W., and Scogin, M. (1993). Teaching and Curriculum at the GSD: Design Jury Roundtables. GSD News, Summer, 3-15.

Doidge, C., Sara, R., and Parnell, R. (2000). The Crit: An Architectural Student’s Handbook. London, UK.: Architectural Press.

Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and Studio Pedagogy Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 16-25.

Egbert, D. D. (1980). Beaux-arts traditions in French architecture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Esherick, J. (1977). Architectural education in the thirties and seventies. In S. Kostof (Ed.), The Architect: Chapters in the History of the Profession (pp. 238-279). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Farivarsadri, G. (2001). A Critical View on Pedagogical Dimensions of Introductory Design in Architectural Education. Retrieved April 21, 2004, from http://www.cebe.heacademy.ac.uk/aee/pdfs/farivarsadrig1.pdf

Frederickson, M. P. (1990). Design Juries: A Study in Lines of Communication Journal of Architectural Education, 43(2), 22-26.

Frederickson, M. P. (1993). Gender and Racial Bias in Design Juries Journal of Architectural Education, 47 (1).

Graham, E. M. (2003). Studio Design Critique: Students and Faculty Expectations and Reality. Unpublished Master Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

Groat, L. N., and Ahrentzen, S. (1996). Reconceptualizing Architectural Education for a More Diverse Future: Perceptions and Visions of Architectural Students Journal of Architectural Education, 49 (3), 166-183.

Gürel, M., and Potthoff, J. K. (2006). Interior Design in Architectural Education International. Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(2), 217-230.

Jones, S. H. (1996). Crits-An Examination International Journal of Art & Design Education, 15 (2), 133-141.

Koch, A., Schwennsen, K., Dutton, T., and Smith, D. (2002). The Redesign of Studio Culture. Washington, DC, USA.: Studio Culture Task Force, American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS).

Kostof, S. (1977). The Architect in the Middle Ages, East and West. In S. Kostof (Ed.), The Architect: Chapters in the History of the Profession. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Llozor, B. D. (2006). Balancing Jury Critique. CEBE Transactions, 3(2), 52-79.

Middleton, R. (1982). The beaux-arts and the nineteenth-century French architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Parnell, R. (2000). The Student-Led ‘Crit’ as a Learning Device. In D. Nicol and S. Pilling (Eds.), Changing Architectural Education. London, United Kingdom: Spon Press.

Salama, A. M. (1995). New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.: Tailored Text and Unlimited Potential.

Salama, A. M., and Al-Amir, A. (2005). Paradigmatic Trends in Architectural Education: Impacts and Challenges. Paper presented at the Congress of the International Union of Architects: Grand Bazzar of Architectures, Istanbul, Turkey.

Salama, A. M. (2005). A Process Oriented Design Pedagogy: The KFUPM Sophomore Studio CEBE Transactions. CEBE Transactions, 2(2), 16-31.

Salama, A. M., and Wilkinson, N. (2007). Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future. In A. M. Salama and N. Wilkinson (Eds.). Gateshead, United Kingdom.: The Urban International Press.

Sara, R. (2004). The Review Process CEBE Transactions, 1 (2), 56-69.

Vowles, H., Nicol, D., and Pilling, S. (2000). The ‘Crit’ as a Ritualized Legitimization Procedure in Architectural Education. In Changing Architectural Education (pp. 259-264.). London, United Kingdom: Spon Press.

Webster, H. (2007). The Analytics of Power: RePresenting the Design Jury Journal of Architectural Education. 60 (3), 21-27.

Wilkin, M. (2000). Reviewing the Review: An Account of a Research Investigation of the ‘Crit’. In D. Nicol and S. Pilling (Eds.), Changing Architectural Education (pp. 100 -107). London, United Kingdom: Spon Press.

Willenbrock, L. L. (1991). An Undergraduate Voice in Architectural Education.. In T. A. Dutton (Ed.), Voices in Architectural Education: Cultural Politics and Pedagogy (pp. 97-117.). New York, USA: Bergen and Garvey.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014