Tasoulla Hadjiyanni, Stephanie Watson Zollinger



With history being an established course in design education and sparking creativity being one of design education’s primary objectives, questions arise as to: What forms of history teaching capture student interest? How can the lessons of history resonate with youth in ways that tie the past to the present? How can assignments spark excitement in students and engender a passion for the subject? And, where can faculty draw inspiration from in re-envisioning the role that history can play in their program and profession? Two interior design educators from the University of Minnesota share techniques, assignments, and pedagogies that respond to the above questions and help set a trajectory for both creatively teaching design history and sparking students’ interest and creative potential.

Going beyond traditional methodologies and discourses around the teaching of history, these educators take a unique perspective and strive for a diverse set of objectives. Employing techniques such as digital games and free-hand sketching, they challenge students to engage with the material first hand. By tying a design project into a history course, they present students with the opportunity to conceive of ways to bridge the past, present, and future. Infusing history classes with creative and critical thinking that encompasses and responds to pressing social concerns reinforces the meaning of history classes and makes history relevant to students’ lives. Through this sharing, the authors aim to spark a dialogue across the disciplines around the teaching of history and makes history relevant to students’ lives. Through this sharing, the authors aim to spark a dialogue across the disciplines around the teaching of history and the renewed role it can play in design education.


Design history; creativity; pedagogy; sketching; technology

Full Text:



Akkach, S. (2002). Useful obsessions: Architecture as a cultural critique. In A. M. Salama, W. O’Reilly, & K. Noschis (Eds.), Architectural Education Today: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Lausanne, Switzerland: Comportements, 31-41. Retrieved on 13 November 2009 from

Attoe, W., & Moore, C. W. (1980). Prologue: On mining history. Journal of Architectural Education - How Not to Teach Architectural History, 34(1), 1-2.

Boden, M. (1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld.

Boland, B. M. (2000). Visualizing history: Inquiring minds want to know. CRM, 23(8), 6-7.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Clark, C. M. (1993). Transformational learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing education, 57,47-56.

Council for Interior Design Accreditation Professional Standards (CIDA) (2009). Retrieved on 12 November 2009 from 2009.pdf.

Creese, W. (1980). Reflections on how to/ how not to teach history. Journal of Architectural Education - How Not to Teach Architectural History, 34 (1), 11-14.

Davidson, J. W., & Lytle, M. H. (1986). After the fact: The art of historical detection. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Dutton, T. (Ed.) (1991). Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. New York: Bergin & Garvey.

Fisher, T. (2008). Architectural design and ethics: Tools for survival. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Flores, C. A. H. (2003). “Will the real Borromini please stand up?” One method of introducing critical reading and analysis through a study of architectural history. Journal of Architectural Education, 56 (3), 63-69.

Hillenbrand, R. (2003). Studying Islamic architecture: Challenges and perspectives. Architectural History, 46, 1-18.

Jackson, N. (2005). Creativity in history teaching and learning. Subject Perspectives on Creativity in Higher Education. Retrieved on 3 September 2009 from

Jarzombek, M. (1999/2000). The disciplinary dislocations of (architectural) history. The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 58 (3), 488-493.

Jennings, J. (1998). Journal of Interior Design Thematic Issue Object-Context-Design: The State of Interior Design History, 24 (2).

Martinson, B., Zollinger, S., & Gardner, C. (2009). The influence of learning styles on design students’ academic progress. Fate in Review: Foundations in Art, Theory and Education, 30, 29-36.

Morgenthaler, H. (1995). Chronology versus system: Unleashing the creative potential of architectural history. Journal of Architectural Education, 48 (4), 218-226.

National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) (2009). Retrieved on 12 November 2009 from

Otto, C. F. (1982). Review of John E. Hancock’s (Ed.) History in, of, and for architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 36(2), 29-30.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw Hill.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018


Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014