VISUALIZATION SKILLS FOR THE NEW ARCHITECTURAL FORMS

Khaled Nassar, Magda Mostafa, Amr Rifki

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.142

Abstract

The practice of architecture is continuously changing, mirroring the paradigm shifts in the world it builds for. With increasing use of digital technology, we need to ensure that learning and teaching do not shift from the fundamental skill set required of an architect. Architectural problems are unique in their nature, requiring volumetric visualization and problem solving skills, and although many of these skills can be replicated using digital technology, can digital technology replace the cognitive development, which occurs through manual problem solving? Over the last three decades we have seen the almost ubiquitous use of computers in the design practice and professional studios with increasingly more complex forms being thought of and turned into buildings. This development obviously raises challenging questions of architectural theory and perplexing issues for those concerned with the future of architectural education and its effect on the design process. But how can this effect be analyzed subjectively remains an open question. Recent research efforts have shown that perception and visualization abilities reflect the quality of a design outcome. Very limited research however exists which attempts to understand or document the spatial analysis and visualization abilities of new generations of architects. This paper reports on a novel scalable test that could be used to investigate the processing and synthesis of visual information related to the new kinds of free form encountered in today’s architecture. Unlike traditional missing views and orthographic projection problems, proposed test can be used to accurate assess freeform visualization. A number of 2-mainfold very high genus surfaces were selected. Physical models of these surfaces are manufactured from a durable thermoplastic material by Fused Deposition Modeling rapid prototyping machines. Students are then asked to position a digital model of the surface to match that of the physical model and vice versa through a number of progressively timed attempts. Results on the average time to success, failure rates, manipulation rate as well as manipulation rate to total time are calculated and analyzed. Statistical analysis of the outcomes was conducted and the results and conclusions of these experiments are presented in this paper along with limitations of the experiments and suggestions for future research. The results should be of interest to architectural educators and architects concerned with the effect of computer technology on the design process, as well as the future of manual skills in our design studios.


Keywords

Design studies; architecture; education; linkographs; entropy; design experiments; pedagogy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Qawasmi, J. (2005). Digital media in architectural design education: Reflections on the e-studio pedagogy. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 4(3), 205-222.

Bilda, Z., & Demarkin, H. (2003). An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design Studies, 24(1), 27-51.

Boucherenc, C.G. (2006). Research on basic design education: An international survey. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 1-30.

Bowen, T. (2003). Making art in a digital/cyber culture: exploring the dialectic between the manual creator and the digital self. Digital Creativity, 14(4), 219-229.

Callieri, M., Cignoni, P., Scopigno, R., Gori, G., & Risaliti, M. (2006). Beyond manual drafting: a restoration-oriented system. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 7(3), 214-226. doi:10.1016/j. culher.2006.06.002.

Dorta, T., Pérez, E., & Lesage, A. (2008). The ideation gap: Hybrid tools, design flow and practice. Design Studies, 29(2), 121-141.

Ferguson, H. (2006). Sculptures. Retrieved from http://www.helasculpt.com.

Ferguson, H., Rockwood, A., & Cox, J. (1992). Topological design of sculptured surfaces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1992, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM, ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, 149-156.

Hadjri, K. (2003). Bridging the gap between physical and digital models in architectural design studios. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIV-5/W10.

Hart, G. (2006). Sculptures. Retrieved from http://www.georgehart.com.

Liu, Y., & Lim, C. (2006). New tectonics: A preliminary framework involving classic and digital thinking.Design Studies, 27(3), 267-307.

Neto, P. (2003). Design communication: Traditional representation methods and computer visualization. Visual Resources: An International Journal of Documentation, 19(3), 195-213.

Perry, C. (2006). Sculptures. Retrieved from http://www.charlesperry.com.

Roelofs, R. (2006). Sculptures. Retrieved from http://www.rinusroelofs.nl.

Sabin, M. (May 2000). Subdivision: Tutorial notes. Shape Modeling International 2001, Tutorial.

Séquin, C. (2005). Rapid prototyping: A 3D visualization tool takes on sculpture and mathematical forms. Communications of the ACM, 48(6), 66-73.

Sequin, C. (2006). Sculptures. Retrieved from http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/sequin.

Snoonian, D., & Cuff, D. (2001). Digital pedagogy: An essay. Architectural Record, 189(9), 200.

Van de Bogart, W. (1990). Cognition, perception and the computer. Leonardo, 23(2/3), 307-313.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014