Azza Kamal, Sedef Doganer, Judith Ruvuna, Jennifer Flores, Edward Hernandez, Taeg Nishimoto

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.145


The San Antonio RiverWalk is an exquisite and dynamic destination for tourists from Texas, as well as from other states in the US. Because of its location in downtown area, the entire area including the RiverWalk, has been incorporated into various guides and maps, all of which seem to be disregarding the interrelationship between the RiverWalk level and the street level. While most maps show either the street level or river level, there are none that illustrate the accessibility the RiverWalk offers to major attractions and buildings at both levels, and none offer an orientation for pedestrians to the destinations on the RiverWalk level, which encountered the lack of visual clarity due to the multilayered terrain. This study investigates the visual obstacles of wayfinding in, and accessibility to the East RiverWalk area. This study, which represents the first phase of a multi-phase analysis of a broader research, emerged from urban research undertaken by a group of architecture educators and students which sought to allow students to become more involved in empirical and action research. A number of tools to investigate pedestrians’ ease of wayfinding and efficiency of identifying accessible transition points in the East RiverWalk area were developed. These tools categorize a number of spatial urban and accessibility features (i.e., entryways, ramps, staircases, and circulation elements) which were used to create 3-D virtual environments demonstrated on two focus groups. The study concluded with a number of recommendations for improving the existing visual and graphic tools, enhancing planning and design considerations, and incorporating the voice of community businesses in addressing wayfinding and accessibility concerns. This study and its outcomes not only engage architecture students in urban research, but also emphasize the significance of the RiverWalk in creating a more livable downtown San Antonio.


Wayfinding; accessibility; qualitative methods; urban pedestrians; San Antonio RiverWalk

Full Text:



Arthur, P., and Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, signs, and architecture. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Carpman, J. R., & Grant, M. A. (2002). Wayfinding: A Broad View. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (427-442).

New York: J. Wiley. Cubukcu, E. (2003). Investigating wayfinding using

virtual environments. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi?acc_num=osu1070246663

Gaisbauer, C., & Frank, A. (2008). Proceedings of AGILE international conference on geographic information science: Wayfinding model for pedestrian navigation. Girona: Spain

Grant, J., & Herbes, B. (2007). Best practice in pedestrian wayfinding within urban areas. Midland Redevelopment Authority. Retrieved from http://www.mra.wa.gov.au/

Holscher, C., Buchner, S., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2009). Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multibuilding ensemble: The effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 208-219.

Hunter, S. (2010). Architectural wayfinding. Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access, University of Buffalo, School of Architecture and Planning. Retrieved from http://udeworld.com/dissemination/publications/47-wayfinding-design/60-wayfinding-design-processgeneral-design-issues.html

Li, C. (2005). User preferences, information transactions, and location-based services: A study of urban pedestrian wayfinding. Computer, Environment, and Urban Systems, 30, 726-740.

Karski, A. (1999). Urban tourism: A key to urban regeneration? The Planner, 76(13), 15-17.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. London: The MIT Press.

Montello, D.R., & Sas, C. (2006). Human factors of wayfinding in navigation. In International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors. UK: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Retrieved from: http://eprints.comp.lancs.ac.uk/2103/1/MontelloSas.pdf

Omer, I., & Goldblatt, R. (2007). The implications of intervisibility between landmarks on wayfinding performance: An investigation using a virtual urban environment. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 3, 520-534.

Passini, R. (1981). Wayfinding: A conceptual framework. Urban Ecology, 5, 17-31.

Richardson, A., Montello, D., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27(4), 741-750.

Spiers, H., & Maguire, E. (2008). The dynamic nature of cognition during wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 232-249.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018


Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014