DESIGN EDUCATION FOR ADAPTIVE REUSE

Ozen Eyüce, Ahmet Eyüce

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v4i2/3.147

Abstract

Built form is subject to various types of obsolences in the course of time. Among these functional obsolesences, taking place as an outcome of ever changing modes of production and consumption, are of crucial importance so far as their fate of existing urban fabric is concerned. Defunct buildings become derelict and often subject to demolition which amounts to the eradication of the collective memory. In this connection the process of adaptive reuse can be defined as the task of adjusting functionally obsolete buildings for new program requirements through building conversion. Adaptive reuse projects entail not only alterations within the boundaries of an existing building envelope but also radical changes/transformations in the space configuration so as to accommodate the new set of functional requirements. Therefore, the development of an architectural design scheme in the light of potentials offered and the constraints imposed by an existing architectural entity is essential. Although adaptive reuse projects require case specific approaches depending on the peculiarities of the original structure three main areas of concern can be discerned during the elaboration of the design scheme. These areas of concerns are the space configuration, tectonic aspects of the context within which the project will be realized. The paper addresses itself to the elucidation of these concern areas and the interrelations with the final scheme.


Keywords

Obselescence; adaptive reuse; space configuration; tectonics; context

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bahl, V. (2005, June 22). Ethics of Adaptive Reuse. Architecture Week. Page B1.2 . 18 May 2005 Retrieved from http://www.architectureweek.com/2005/0518/building_1-2.html ( For further reading: Adorno,T.W. (1997). Functionalism Today in Rethinking Architecture. Leach, N. (Ed.). London: Routledge).

Butler, W. L. (2008). The Cultural Landscape of a Site in Old Montreal: Reflections on Urban Memory Montreal as Palimpsest; Architecture, Community,

Change. Conference on the History of Architecture. April 18,2008.(quoted from Crinson, Mark. (2005). An Introduction in Urban Memory: History and Amnesia in the Modern City. New York, NY. : Routledge, p:4)

Retrieved January 20, 2010 from http://art-history.concordia.ca/institute_site/conf08_palimpsest/en/palimsest_papers.html

Cantacuzino, S. (1989). Re-Architecture: Old Buildings/New Uses. New York, NY: Abbeville Press.

Hight, C., Hensel, M. & Menges, A. (2009). En Route: Towards a Discourse on Heterogeneous Space beyond Modernist Space-Time and Post-Modernist Social Geography. In Hight, C., Hensel, M. & Menges, A. (Eds.) Space Reader : Heterogeneous Space in Architecture.(pp.9-37). West Sussex :John Wiley and Sons.

Hewitt, Mark Alan. (1994 May). Architecture for a Contingent Environment. Journal of Architectural Education.47(4), 197-209.

Picon, Antoine. (2004). The Freestanding Column in Eighteenth-Century Religious Architecture . In Daston, L.(Ed.) Things That Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. (pp.67-99). New York, NY. : Zone Books.

Psarra,P. (2009). Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning.

New York, NY : Routledge (quoted from Hillier, B. (1966) Space is the Machine . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p:33).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014