A PEDAGOGICAL APPROACH TO INTEGRATE PARAMETRIC THINKING IN EARLY DESIGN STUDIOS

Chaham Alalouch

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i2.1584

Abstract

Parametric design has been perceived as a highly sophisticated set of procedures requiring complex specialized softwares, making its introduction as part of undergraduate architectural education difficult. The aim of this study is to explore the possibility of introducing parametric thinking to novice architectural design students, using a purpose-designed non-CAD method. After a detailed lecture, students were asked to use the method to perform a design task based on parametric design principles and inspired by elements from vernacular architecture. Students’ feedback was obtained in regard to three learning domains: Intellectual Skills, Cognitive Strategies, and Affective; and the effects of previous knowledge of CAD and gender were explored. The data was analysed statistically. Results showed that the method has managed to successfully address the three learning domains, with most of the students expressing a strong intention to learn more about Parametricism. Both genders were found to be equally prepared to receive and accept information about parametric design through our method. Students with previous CAD training showed better control over the method, whereas the other group showed better appreciation of the concept. It is concluded that when parametric thinking is seen as a pedagogic intention and not as a design tool, it can be effectively introduced to novice design students, in order to prepare them to meet the demand in practice for graduates who are aware of the recent trends in architectural design and form generation processes, and who are prepared to use the latest digital tools efficiently. 


Keywords

Design education; parametric design; architectural design; design method(s); learning domains; Oman

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Jokhadar, A. & Jabi, W. (2017). Applying the Vernacular Model to High-Rise Residential Development in the Middle East and North Africa. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 11 (2): 175-189.

Almusharaf, A. M. & Elnimeiri, M. (2010). A Performance-Based Design Approach for Early Tall Building Form Development. 19-21 October. Fez, Morocco, Proceedings of 5th International Conference the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design.

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.

Anderson, J. & Tang, M. (2011). Form Follows Parameters: Parametric modeling for fabrication and manufacturing processes. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Newcastle, Australia, pp 91-100.

Bielik, M., Schneider, V. & König, R. (2012). Parametric Urban Patterns: Exploring and Integrating Graph-Based Spatial Properties in Parametric Urban Modelling. Proceedings of the 30 th eCAADe Conference, 12-14 September, Prague, Czech, pp. 701-708.

Bloom, B. S. et al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Carraher, E. (2011). Parameters of a Digital Design Foundation. University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Proceedings of ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference: Parametricism (SPC).

Erlendsson, G. T. & Erk, G. K. (2012). Temporal and Urban Peripheries in Systems Thinking. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 6 (2): 149-157. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v6i2.90

Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Gagne, R. M. (1972). Domains of learning. Interchange, 3 (1): 1-8.

Grierson, D. & Munro, K. E. (2018). Towards Transformative Learning Methods for Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Education for Sustainable Development (Esd): A Case Study. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12 (1): 209-227. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1430

Harrow, A. (1972). A Taxonomy of Psychomotor Domain: A Guide for Developing Behavioral Objectives. New York: David McKay.

Hernandez, C. R. (2006). Thinking parametric design: introducing parametric Gaudi. Design Studies, 27: 309-324.

Herr, C. M. and Karakiewicz, J. (2007). Algogram: Automated Diagrams for an Architectural Design Studio. In Dong, A., Moere, V.

& Gero, JS. Edit. (2007). Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures (CAAD Futures) - Proceedings of the 12th International CAAD Futures Conference. Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4020-6527-9

Holzer, D., Hough, R. & Burry, M. (2007). Parametric Design and Structural Optimisation for Early Design Exploration. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 5(4): 625–643.

Howe, N. (2011). Algorithmic Modeling: Teaching Architecture in Digital Age. University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Proceedings of ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference: Parametricism (SPC).

Iordanova, I. (2008). Teaching Digital Design Exploration: Form Follows.... International Journal of Architectural Computing, 5(4): 685-702.

Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab) use them. Medical Education, 38: 1212–1218.

Karle, D. & Kelly, B. M. (2011). Parametric Thinking. University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Proceedings of ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference: Parametricism (SPC).

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S. & Masia, B. B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay.

Leach, N. (2009). Digital Morphogenesis. Architectural Design, 79(1): 32–37.

Lecourtois, C. & Guéna, F. (2012). Architectural design education and parametric modeling: An architecturological approach. In Gu, N. & Wang, X. Edit (2012). Computational Design Methods and Technologies: Applications in CAD, CAM and CAE Education. P. 338-350. 10.4018/978-1-61350-180-1.ch019

Lobaccaro, G., Wiberg, A. H., Ceci, G., Manni, M., Lolli, N., Berardi, U. (2018). Parametric Design to Minimize the Embodied GHG Emissions in A ZEB. Energy and Buildings, 167: 106-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.025.

Mitchell, W. (1994). Three Paradigms for Computer Aided Design. In: G. Carrara & Y. Kalay, Eds. Knowledge Based Computer Aided Architectural Design. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 379-89.

Monedero, J. (2000). Parametric design: a review and some experiences. Automation in Construction, 9: 369–377.

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C. & Simon, H. A. (1957). Elements of a Theory of Human Problem Solving. CA: Rand Corporation.

Novitski, B. J. (1999). The Computer Education Received by Today’s Architecture Students may not Provide them with the Skills Sought by Employers. Architectural Record, 184(4): 39-42.

Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking Difference: Theories and Models of Parametric Design Thinking. Design Studies, 52 (2017) 4-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001

Oxman, R. (2006). Theory and Design in the First Digital Age. Design Studies, 27: 229-265.

Poole, S. (2007). Pumping Up: Digital Steroids and the Design Studio. In: Material Matters. London: Routledge, pp. 103-114.

Ra, S. (2011). Parametric Translations. University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Proceedings of ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference: Parametricism (SPC).

Salama, A. M. (2010). Delivering Theory Courses in Architecture: Inquiry-Based, Active, and Experiential Learning Integrated. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4 (2-3): 278-295.

Salama, A. M., & MacLean, L. (2017). Integrating Appreciative Inquiry (AI) into architectural pedagogy: an assessment experiment of three retrofitted buildings in the city of Glasgow. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(2), 169-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2017.02.001

Salama, A. M. & Crosbie, M. J. (2010). Design Education: Explorations and Prospects for a Better Built Environment. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4 (2-3): 10-18.

Senske, N. (2011). A Curriculum for Integrating Computational Thinking. University of Nebraska- Lincoln, Proceedings of ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference: Parametricism (SPC).

Suyoto, W., Indraprastha, A. & Purbo, H. W. (2015). Parametric Approach as a Tool for Decision-making in Planning and Design Process- Case study: Office Tower in Kebayoran Lama. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184: 328 – 337.

Taleb, H. & Musleh, M. M. (2015). Applying urban parametric design optimisation processes to a hot climate-UAE. Sustainable Cities and Society, 14: 236–253.

Teymur, N. (2001). '4 x 4' > Towards a working theory of architectural education. Cardiff, Proceeding of Architectural Education Exchange 2001 Conference.

Turrin, M., Buelow, P. V. & Stouffs, R. (2011). Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25: 656–675.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Yuan, Z. Sun, C. Wang, Y. (2018). Design for Manufacture and Assembly-Oriented Parametric Design of Prefabricated Buildings. Automation in Construction 88: 13-22. doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.021


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Chaham Alalouch

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014