AN EDUCATIONAL APPLICATION BASED ON VIRTUAL REALITY TECHNOLOGY FOR LEARNING ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS: CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS

Sayyed Amir Hossain Maghool, Seyed Hossein (Iradj) Moeini, Yasaman Arefazar

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i3.1719

Abstract

Architectural learning is intensely multifaceted and faces many challenges. Educational theories such as Problem Based Learning, Flipped Learning, Learning Styles theory, and Experiential Learning theory are researchers’ responses to those challenges. In fact, many of these theories need proper means in order to be effectively applied in architectural education. Moreover, the possibilities provided by Virtual Reality (VR) Technology, combined with the complex intrinsic properties of architectural pedagogy, place this technology under architecture researchers’ constant watch. With its experiential nature, VR technology can improve architectural students’ learning. Although the study of VR applications for educational purposes is not new, this is rarely studied in the light of emerging learning theories in architectural education. In response, an educational application called LADUVR (“Learning Architectural Details Using Virtual Reality Technology”) has been designed by the authors to show how VR would address the current shortcomings of architecture learning systems. The present paper discusses the benefits and challenges of developing these kinds of applications, and shows how by using LADUVR users can experience being on a construction site, investigate the architectural details closely, and test what they have learned in an interactive and immersive environment. To continue, the paper examines the feedback from the implementation of LADUVR; with the results indicating that LADUVR would indeed enhance the learning of architectural detailing in most aspects. The paper concludes with a comparison between the use of this application and conventional learning methods.

Keywords

virtual reality; architectural educational; immersive environment; problem based learning; flipped learning; experiential learning; learning styles

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, Newburyport, MA.

Angulo, A. (2015). Rediscovering Virtual Reality in the Education of Architectural Design: The immersive simulation of spatial experiences. International Journal of Sensory Environment, Architecture and Urban Space. Retrieved September 30, 2016, from https://journals.openedition.org/ambiances/594

(Q2 2016). Augmented/Virtual Reality Report. California, USA: Digi-Capital.

Bailie, T., Martin, J., Aman, Z., Brill, R., & Herman, A. (2016). Implementing User-Centered Methods and Virtual Reality to Rapidly Prototype Augmented Reality Tools for Firefighters. International Conference on Augmented Cognition (pp. 135-144). Springer, Cham.

Banerjee, H. K., & Graaff, E. D. (1996). Problem-based learning in architecture: Problems of integration of technical disciplines. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 185-195.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bibbings, H., Bieluga, P. A., & Mills, C. (2018). Enhancing Creativity and Independent Learning of Architectural Technology Students through the Use of a Real Life Design Competition Module. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(1), 376-387.

Bridges, A. (2007). Problem based learning in architectural education. Proceedings of CIB 24th W78 Conference (pp. 755-761). Maribor: CIB (International Council for Building).

Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., & Most, R. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Vol. 1985). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Camp, G. (1996). Problem-Based Learning: A Paradigm Shift or a Passing Fad? Medical Education Online, 1(1), 4282.

Canizaro, V.B. (2012). Design-Build in Architectural education: Motivations, Practices, Challenges, Successes and Failures. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 6(3), 20-36.

Chakradeo, U. (2010). Design Pedagogy -- A Tested Path. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2/3), 107-115.

Chung, H. (2007). Achieving Efficient Real-time Virtual Reality Architectural Visualisation. Singapore. Retrieved 3 06, 2016, from National University of Singapore Library: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/bitstream/10635/13273/1/Daniel%20Masters%20Thesis.pdf

Collins Dictionary. Virtual Reality Definition. Retrieved 9 9, 2017, from Collins Dictionary: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/virtual-reality

Costello, H. (2017). E-Learning-Global Market Outlook (2016-2022). Dallas: Orbis Research. Retrieved from Research and Markets: http://orbisresearch.com/reports/index/e-learning-global-market-outlook-2016-2022

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. USA: SAGE Publications.

Crysler, C. (2013). Critical Pedagogy and Architectural Education. Journal of Architectural Education,48(4), 208-217.

Danaci, H.M. (2015). Creativity and knowledge in architectural education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,174, 1309-1312.

Davies, R.S., Dean, D.L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development (ETR&D), 61(4), 563-580.

Dvorak, J., Hamata, V., Skacilik, J., & Benes, B. (2005). Boosting up architectural design education with virtual reality. Central European Multimedia and Virtual Reality (CEMVR) Conference, 5, 95-200.

Eissa, H. T., & Lee, J. H. (2008). DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE WEB-BASED MODEL FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN EDUCATION (DAAD) An e-Learning Environment for an Architectural Design Course. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(2), 23-40.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering education, 78(7), 674-681.

Felder, R.M., & Soloman, B.A. (1993). Resources for Teaching and Learning STEM. Retrieved 2016, from INDEX OF LEARNING STYLES (ILS): http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/styles.pdf

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To improve the academy, 11(1), 137-155.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. ALT-J, 3(2), 5-34.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.

Jensen, C. G. (2017). Collaboration and dialogue in Virtual reality. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, Special issue: Blended Learning in Architecture and Design Education, 5(1), 85-110.

Hao, Y. (2014). Students’ attitude towards a flipped classroom and its relationship with motivation orientations in an undergraduate course. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2835-2840). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Harrisberger, L. (1976). Experiential learning in engineering education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.

Heim, M. (1994). The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford University Press.

Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types, volume 6 of The collected works of CG Jung. Princeton University Press, 18, 169-170.

Kalisperis, L., Otto, G., Muramoto, K., Gundurum, J., Masters, R., & Orland, B. (2002). An Affordable Immersive Environment in Beginning Design Studio Education. Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, (pp. 49-56).

Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning. Pennsylvania: Cambridge Adult Education.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kolb, D. A. (1976). The Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual. Boston, MA: McBer & Co.

Liou, W.-K., Bhagat, K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). Beyond the Flipped Classroom: A Highly Interactive CloudClassroom (HIC) Embedded into Basic Materials Science Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460–473.

Marescaux, J., & Rubino, F. (2005). Robotic surgery: potentials, barriers, and limitations. European Surgery, 37(5), 279–283.

Mulligan, K., Calder, A., & Mulligan, H. (2018). Inclusive design in architectural practice: Experiential learning of disability in architectural education. Disability and health journal, 11(2), 237-242.

Nabih, H. E. (2010). Process-based learning: towards theoretical and lecture-based coursework in studio style. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2/3), 90-106

Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of Science a Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Pan, Z., Aylett, R., Diener, H., Jin, X., Gobel, S., & Li, L. (2006). Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment. Proceedings of First International Conference, Edutainment 2006. Hangzhou, China, April 16-19. Springer-Verlag.

Partridge, H., Ponting, D., & McCay, M. (2011). Good Practice Report: Blended Learning. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77.

Portman, M., Natapov, A., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2015). To Go Where No Man Has Gone Before: Virtual Reality in Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 376-384.

Rickel, J. (2001). Intelligent Virtual Agents for Education and Training: Opportunities and Challenges. Proceedings of Intelligent Virtual Agents: Third International Workshop (pp. 15-22). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 186-193.

Salama, A. M. (2015). Salama, A.M. (2015). Spatial Design Education: New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond. London, UK: Routledge.

Salama, A. M. (2006). Committed educators are reshaping studio pedagogy. Open House International, 31(3), 4-9.

Sampaio, A. Z., Ferreira, M. M., & Rosário, D. P. (2009). Interactive virtual application on building maintenance: The lighting component. In Proceedings of IRF2009, 3rd International Conference on Integrity, Reliability and Failure: Challenges and Opportunities, Symposium Visualization and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 20-24).

Sampaio, A. Z., Henriques, P. G., & Martins, O. P. (2010). Virtual reality technology used in civil engineering education. The open virtual reality journal, 2(1),18-25.

Search results - Virtual reality. (2017). Retrieved from ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/search?qs=virtual+reality&authors=&pub=&volume=&issue=&page=&origin=home&zone=qSearch

Stice, J. E. (1987). Using Kolb's Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering education, 77(5), 291-96.

Walshaw, E. (2015). Understanding Architectural Details. First in Architecture. Retrieved from http://www.firstinarchitecture.co.uk/understanding-architectural-details/

Wang, R., Newton, S., & Lowe, R. (2015). Experiential learning styles in the age of a virtual surrogate. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 9(3), 93-110.

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369.

Winn, W. (1993). A Conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of Virtual Reality. Human Interface Technology Laboratory of the Washington Technology Center, Seattle: University of Washington, 93-96.

Wong, D. K. P., & Lam, D. O. B. (2007). Problem-based learning in social work: A study of student learning outcomes. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(1), 55-65.

Zairul, M. (2018). Introducing Studio Oriented Learning Environment (SOLE) in UPM, Serdang: Accessing Student-Centered Learning (SCL) in the Architectural Studio. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(1), 241-250.

Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H.W. (2009). Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education.

Zhang, C. J., & Liu, W. S. (2012). Research on VR-Based Experiment Space for Complex Electromagnetic Environment. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 403, pp. 2923-2926). Trans Tech Publications.

Zimmermann, P. (2008). Virtual Reality Aided Design. A Survey of the Use of VR in Automotive Industry. In D. Talaba (ed.), Product Engineering (pp. 277-296). Springer, Dordrecht.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Sayyed Amir Hossain Maghool, Seyed Hossein (Iradj) Moeini, Yasaman Arefazar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014