PROPORTIONS AND HUMAN SCALE IN DAMASCENE COURTYARD HOUSES

M. Salim Ferwati, M. Alaa Mandour

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v2i1.185

Abstract

Interior designers, architects, landscape architects, and even urban designers, agree that environment, as a form of non-verbal communication means, has a symbolic dimension to it. As for its aesthetic dimension, it seems that beauty is related to a certain proportion, partially and as a whole. Suitable proportion leaves a good impression upon the beholders, especially when it matches human proportion. That in fact was the underlining belief of LeCorbusier, according to which he developed his Modular concept. The study searches for a modular, or proportion, system that governs the design of Damascene traditional house. By geometrical and mathematical examinations of 28 traditional houses, it was found that a certain proportional relationship existed; however, these proportional relationships were not fixed ones. The study relied on analyzing the Iwan elevation as well as the inner courtyard proportion in relation to the building area. Charts, diagrams and tables were produced to summarize the results.


Keywords

Proportion; human scale, traditional architecture; Damascus; courtyard houses

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abas, S. (1004) (digitized 2004). Islamic Geometrical Patterns for the Teaching of Mathematics of Symmetry, Symmetry: Culture and Science, Vol.12 (1- 2), pp. 53 – 65.

Ardalan, N., and Bakhtiar, L. (2000). The Sense of Unity, New Edition, ABC International Group, Inc.

Ching, F.D.K. (1996). Proportion and Scale, Architecture: Space, Form, and Order, John & Sons, Toronto, Canada, pp. 278 – 319.

Dodds, J.D. (1992). (ed.) Al-Andalus: The Art of Islamic Spain, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, USA.

El-Said, I., and Parman, A. (1988). Geometric Concepts in Islamic Art, Reprint, Scorpion Publishing.

Fletcher, S.B. (1996). The History of Architecture, The Royal Institute of British Architects and the University of London, United KingdomK, 20th Edition.

Hale, J. (1994). The Old Way of Seeing: How Architecture Lost Its Magic (And How to Get It Back), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Langhein, J. (2005). Proportion and Traditional Architecture, INTBAU Essay, The Prince’s Foundation / INTBAU, London, United Kingdom, Online http://www.intbau.org/essay10.htm .

Meiss, P.V. (2005). Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place. E & FN Spon, London, United Kingdom..

Ozdural, A. (1995). Omar Khayyam, Mathematicians and Conversation with Artisans, JSAH, Vol. 54 (1), pp. 54 – 71.

Palladio, A. (2002). The Four Books on Architecture, Translated by Robert Tavernor and Richard Schofield, MIT Press, Boston, Mass, USA.

Rasmussen, S.E. (1964). Scale and Proportion, in Experiencing Architecture, MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 104 – 126.

Rudolf, W. (1998). Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA. 3rd rev. ed.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014