SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND RESIDENTIAL SPACE: CONTEXTUALIZING NEW URBANISM WITHIN A BROADER THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Mohamad Kashef

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v3i3.191

Abstract

This study engages the planning and urban design literature as well as social theory to develop a nuanced understanding of issues related to neighborhood form and sense of community. The study analyzes the meaning of community from economic, social, and cultural perspectives. It contextualizes the New Urbanism use of physical design as a subtext for community within a broader theoretical context. The study revisits the New Urbanism design principle regarding the interface between the private and public realm and its relationship to the idea of place and social attachment. While questioning the relevance of the New Urbanism planning agenda to U.S. metropolitan formations, the study discussions underline the value of its design formula for the social life of residential neighborhoods. The multidisciplinary approach of this study unravels some of the confusion over sociospatial dialectics in general, and community and built environment in particular. It opens the door for further cross-disciplinary research aimed at understanding and potentially optimizing the relationship between people and their built environments.


Keywords

Sense of community; place attachment; neighborhood design; new Urbanism

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arendt, R. G. (1996). Conservation design for subdivisions: A practical guide to creating open space networks. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

Agnew, J. A., and Duncan, J. S. (1989). The power of place: Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander, C. (1965) A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum, 122 (1), 58-62.

Alexander, C. (1977) A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barnette, J. (1995). The fractured metropolis: Improving the new city, restoring the old city, reshaping the region. New York: Harper Collins.

Bentley I. (1999). Urban transformations: Power, people and urban design. London and New York: Rutledge. Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S. and

Smith, G. (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.

Biddulph, M. (2000). Villages don’t make a city. Journal of Urban Design, 5 (1), 65-82.

Bonnes, M. and Secchiaroli, G. (1995). Environmental psychology: A psycho-social introduction. London: Sage Publications.

Boarnet, M. and Crane, R. (2001). Travel by design: The influence of urban form on travel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bogart, W. (1998). The economics of cities and suburbs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Box, H. (2007). Think like an architect. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Brindley, T. (2003). The social dimension of the urban village: a comparison of models for sustainable urban development. URBAN Design International, 8, 53-65.

Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, diversity and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Calthorpe, P. and W. Fulton (2001). The regional city. Washington: Island Press.

Campbell, K. E. and Lee, B. A. (1992). Sources of personal neighborhood networks: Social integration, need for time. Social Forces, 70, 1077-1100.

Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places-urban spaces: The dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Dickens, P. (2000). Social Darwinism: Linking evolutionary thought to social theory. Milton Keynes: OU Press.

Duany, A. & Z. Plater (1991). Towns and town-making principles. New York: Rizzoli.

Duany, A. and Plater-Zyberk, E. (2000). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press.

Duany, A. (2002). Introduction to the special issue: The transect. Journal of Urban Design, 7 (3), 252-260.

Duany, A. and Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992). The second coming of the American small town. Wilson Quarterly, 16, 3-51.

Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., and Alminana, R. (2003). The new civic art: Elements of town planning. New York: Rizzoli.

Dutton, J. A. (2000). New American urbanism: Reforming the suburban metropolis. Milano, Italy: Skira Architecture Library.

Ellin, N. (1995). Postmodern urbanism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Ewing R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (1), 107-26.

Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association: FNMA) (1996). Survey of residential satisfaction of housing occupants, Washington, DC, 1996.

Filion, P. (1996) Metropolitan planning objectives and implementation constraints: Planning in a post-fordist and postmodern age. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1637-1660.

Flanagan, W. G. (1993). Contemporary urban sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fleming, R., Baum, A. and Singer, J. E. (1985). Social support and the physical environment. In S. Cohen and S. L. Syme (Eds), Social Support and Health. New York: Academic press.

Fulton, W. (1996). The New Urbanism: Hope or hype for American communities?. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Gans, H. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italian Americans. New York: The Free Press.

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.

Gordon, P. and H. Richardson (1997). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (1), 95-106.

Gottdiener, M. (1994). The social production of urban space. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Gratz, R. B. & Norman, M. (1998). Cities back from the edge: New life for downtown. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Giuliani, M. V. and Feldman, R. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 267-274.

Hall, P. (1996). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hall, P. and Ward, C. (1998). Sociable cities: The legacy of Ebenezer Howard. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Harvey, D. (1997). The New Urbanism and the communitarian trap. Harvard Design Magazine, Winter/Spring 1997 (1).

Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkley: University of California Press.

Hastrup, K. (2004). All the world’s stage: The imaginative texture of social spaces. Space and Culture, 7, 223.

Heimlich, R. E., and Anderson, W. D. (2001). Development at the urban fringe and beyond: Impacts on agriculture and rural land. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA. Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer803

Herzog, T. R., Maguire, C. P., and Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23 (2), 159-170.

Hidalgo, M. C. and Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions.Journal of Environmental Sociology, 21, 273-281.

Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kashef, M. (2008). Architects and planners approaches to urban form and design in the Toronto region: A comparative analysis. Geoforum, 39 (1), 414-437.

Katz, P. (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: MacGraw-Hill.

Kelbaugh, D. (1997). Common place: Toward neighborhood and regional design. Washington: University of Washington Press.

Kingston, S., Mitchell, R., Florin, P., and Stevenson, J. (1999). Sense of community in neighborhoods as a multi-level construct. Journal of Community Psychology, 27 (6), 681-694.

Kreditor, A. (1990). The neglect of urban design in the American academic succession. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9 (3), 155-163.

Krieger, A. (1998). Whose urbanism?. Harvard Design Magazine, November 1998.

Krier, L. (1998). Architecture: Choice or fate. London: Papadakis.

Kunstler, J. H. (1993). The geography of nowhere. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Lang, J. (1994). Urban design: The American experience. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Langdon, P. (1994). A better place to live: Reshaping the American suburb. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lund, H. (2002). Pedestrian environments and sense of safety. Journal of Planning education and Research, 21, 301-312.

Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of New Urbanism. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69 (4), 414-429.

McHarg, I. (1969). Design With nature. New York: Doubleday.

Miller, A. S. and Maxwell, L. E. (2005). Exploring the role of home design on fostering family interaction: The use of programming methods in research. Journal of Interior Design, 29 (1&2), 50-65.

Morrow-Jones, H., Irwin, E. G., and Roe, B. (2004). Consumer preference for neotraditional neighborhood characteristics. Hosing Policy Debate, 15 (1), 171-202.

Moughtin, C., Cuesta, C. S., and Signoretta, P. (2003). Urban design: Method and techniques. Oxford: Architectural press.

Moustafa, Y. M. (2009). Design and neighborhood sense of community: An integrative and crossculturally valid theoretical framework. International Journal of Architectural Research (IJAR), 3 (1), 71-91.

Neal, P. (Ed.) (2003). Urban villages and the making of communities. London and New York: Spon Press.

Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25 (1), 11-26.

Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: The Macmillan.

O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban economics. Chicago: Irwin.

Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Bajaj, R., Bromberg, J., Congdon, C., Rashid, M., Warmels, S., Zhang, Y. and Zimring, C. (2007). Designing space to support knowledge work, Environment and Behavior, 38, 815- 840.

Plas, J. M. and Lewis, S. E. (1996). Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 109- 143.

Rapoport, A. (1980). Human behavior and environment: Environment and culture..

Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Rossi, A. (1982). The architecture of the city. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

Rowe, C. and Koetter, F. (1978). Collage city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Skjaeveland, O., and Garling, T. (1997). Effects of interactional space on neighboring. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 181-198.

Skjaeveland, O., and Garling, T. and Maeland, J. G. (1996). A multidimensional measure of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24 (3), 413-435.

Soja, E. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. MA: Blackwell.

Southworth, M. (1997). Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neotraditional communities at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (1), 28-44.

Stein, M. (1964). The eclipse of community: An interpretation of American studies. New York: Princeton University Press.

Tait, M. (2003). Urban villages as self-sufficient, integrated communities: A case study in London’s Docklands. Urban Design International, 8, 37-52.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014