THE IMPORTANCE OF GREEN SPACE: TOWARDS A QUALITY LIVING ENVIRONMENT IN URBAN AREAS Dzarul

Dzarul Hardy Azwar, IIzham Ghani

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v3i1.267

Abstract

This paper considers the preference of residents, living in urban areas with low to high percentage of greenery coverage in correlation with the household income. This paper would serve as a background study to investigate the resident’s view on the “quality” of their residential streets and their residential areas. It would be focused on what the residents consider as the important factors that makes a “high quality” residential street environment and what are the important factors in creating a “good” place to live. The study proposed to be undertaken in Kuala Lumpur, the national capital city of Malaysia at four selected residential district ranging from underprivileged to affluent neighborhood areas. Samplings would be based on gender, age, ethnicity, education and occupation to identify any significant differences present between the groups, in order to determine the issues that could be taken into account for future provision, planning and management. This study would explore the resident’s attitude towards street trees and residential gardens as part of the urban green space environment towards their conceptions of urban quality of life in the selected neighborhood residential areas.


Keywords

Green space; urban area; residents; quality of life; landscape

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baines, C. (2000). A Forest of Other Issues, Landscape Design, No.294, pp. 46-47.

Barber, A. (1993). Sheffield Parks Regeneration Strategy, Cinteract Consultancy Services, Sheffield, UK.

Barker, G. (1997). A Framework for the Future: Green Networks with Multiple Uses in and Around Towns and Cities, English Nature Research Report, No.256, Peterborough, UK.

Bell, W. (1998). Women and Community Safety, Paper presented at Safer Communities: Strategic Direction in Urban Planning, 10-11 September 1998, Melbourne, Australia.

Benatsky, A. (1978). Tree Ecology and Preservation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Berleyne, D. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century, New York, USA.

Birnbaum, C.A. (2003). Why Aren’t Landscape Architects Speaking Out about the Impending Destruction of Modernist Masterpieces?, Landscape

Architecture, August 2003, pp. 62-64.

Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M. & Limb, M. (1988). People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City, Urban Studies, Vol. 25, No.6, pp. 455-473.

CABE (2001). The Value of Urban Design, A Research Project Commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by Good Urban Design, Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment, London, UK.

City Hall Kuala Lumpur (CHKL) (2003). Draft Structure Plan Kuala Lumpur 2020 Book, City Hall Kuala Lumpur (CHKL), Malaysia.

DETR (2001). Revision of Planning Policy Guidance Note (PPG) 17: Sport, Open Space and Recreation, Consultation Paper, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, UK.

DTLR (2001). Green Spaces, Better Places: Interim report of the Urban Green Spaces Taskforce, Department for Transport, Local Government and Regions, London, UK.

Urban Parks Forum (2001). Public Park Assessment: A Survey of Local Authority Owned Parks Focusing on Parks of Historic Interest, Final Report, Caversham, UK.

DTLR (2002). Green Spaces, Better Places, Final Report of the Urban Green Spaces Taskforce, Department for Transport, Local Government and Regions, London, UK.

Duffy, B. (2003). Parks and Open Spaces Are Some of the Most Popular Public Services, But Least Understood. Bobby Duffy Examines Research into the Public’s Perception of How These Resources Affect the Quality Of Life, Landscape Design, No.3, pp. 37- 40.

Fines, K. (1968). Landscape Evaluation: A Resource Project in East Sussex, Regional Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 41-55.

Fisher, B., & Nasar, J. (1992). Fear of Crime in Relation to Three Exterior Site Features: Prospect, Refuge and Escape, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 35-65.

Galindo, M.P.G. & Rodriguez, J.A.C.(2000). Environmental Aesthetics and Psychological Wellbeing: Relationships between Preference Judgements for Urban Landscapes and other Relevant Affective Responses, Psychology in Spain, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 13-27.

Gordon, C. & Shirley, P. (2003). All Things to All People, Approaches To Design And Use Of Urban Parks Are Evolving, Chris Gordon and Peter Shirley Put the Current Thinking into Context, Landscape Design, No.3, pp. 13-17.

Grahn, P. (1985). Man’s Needs for Urban Parks, Greenery and Recreation, Institute for Landscape Planning, Swedish Agricultural University, Alnarp, Sweden.

Grahn, P., Mårtensson, F., Lindblad, B., Nilsson, P. & Ekman, A. (1997). Out in the Preschool (Ute på Dagis), Stad and Land, 145.

Green, P. (2003). Perception of Landscape Quality Amongst Users and Managers of Urban Parks, Research Proposal, Department of Landscape,

University of Sheffield, UK.

Heisler, G.M. (1986). Energy Savings with Trees, Journal of Arboriculture, 12(5), pp. 113-125.

Hetherington, J., Daniel, T.C. & Brown, T.C. (1993). Is Motion More Important Than It Sounds? The Medium of Presentation in Environmental Research, Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.13, pp. 283-291.

Jones, N. (2001). Green Leaves, Landscape Design, No. 299, pp. 30.

Jones, N. (2003). Function of Trees: Breathing Space, Landscape Design, No. 321, pp. 20-22.

Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1982). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective, Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, R. (1983). The Role of Nature in the Urban Context, In Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J.F. (Eds.), Human Behavior and the Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York, USA, Vol. 6, pp. 127-161.

Kellert, S. R. & Wilson, E.O. (Eds.). (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis, Island Press/Shearwater Books, Washington D.C., USA.

Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M. & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Transforming Inner-city Landscapes: Trees, Sense of Safety and Preference, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 30, No.1, pp. 28-59.

Leather, P., Pyrgas, M., Beale, D. & Lawrence, C. (1998) Windows In The Workplace-Sunlight, View And Occupational Stress, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 30, No.6, pp. 739-762.

Leccese, M. (1999). To Repair or Replace? Despite A Boom in Downtown Denver, Only Shady Character Seem to Use the Area’s Largest Park. What Should Be Done?, Landscape Architecture, December 1999, pp. 48-51.

Littlewood, M. (2003). Urban Gardens: Space Invader, Landscape Design, No.321, pp. 30-32. Luymes, D. & Tamminga, D. (1995). Integrating Public Safety and Use into Planning Urban Greenways, Landscape and Planning, Vol. 33, pp. 391-400.

Pitt, D., Soergell, K. & Zube, E. (1979). Trees in the City, In Laurie, I. (Ed.), Nature in Cities: The Natural Environment in the Design and Development of Urban Green Space, Wiley, Chichester, NY, USA, pp. 205-229.

Porteous, D.J. (1982). Urban Environmental Aesthetics, In Sadler, B. & Carlson, A. (Eds.), Environmental Aesthetics: Essays in Interpretation, Western Geographical Series, 20, Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada, pp. 67-95.

Rohde, C. L. E. & Kendle, A. D. (1994). Report to English Nature-Human Wellbeing, Natural Landscapes and Wildlife in Urban Areas: A Review, Department of Horticulture and Landscape and the Research Institute for the Care of the Elderly, Bath: University of Reading, UK.

Rossman, B. & Ulehla, Z.J. (1977). Psychological Reward Values Associated with Wilderness Use, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 41-66.

Sadler, B. & Carlson, A. (Eds.). (1982). Environmental Aesthetics: Essays in Interpretation, Western Geographical Series, 20, Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada.

Schauman, S., Penland, S. & Freeman, M. (1987). Public Knowledge and Preferences for Wildlife Habitats in Urban Open Spaces, In Adams, L. & Leedy, D.L. (Eds.), Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment: Proceedings from the National Symposium on Urban Wildlife, National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia.

Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery, Science Journal, Vol. 224, pp. 420-421.

Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A. & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress Recovery during Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, pp. 201-230.

Wehmeier, S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English: Sixth edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Zube, E. (1971). Trees and Woodlands in the Design of the Urban Environment, In Little, Silas and Noyes, J.H. (Eds.), Trees and Forest in an Urbanizing Environment, Planning and Resource Development Series, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, No. 17, pp. 145- 150.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014