Dicle Aydin, Ummugulsum Ter

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v2i3.294


This article studied the concept of campus plaza, i.e. the outdoor space of the Selcuk University located in Konya, Turkey. The objective of the study in which the survey, observation and photographic methods were used, was to examine the plaza as an outdoor space providing individual and social benefits to campus people and to determine the principles regarding the establishment of this space. Two hundred forty-three students participating in the survey were asked about the outdoor spaces they use in the campus area, the qualities of the plaza, their purposes and the frequency of plaza use, and a descriptive analysis was performed to determine the plaza’s quality. Additionally, a correlation analysis was carried out to evaluate the relationship between the landscape accessory and the manner in which the users’ senses were affected by the experienced space (profiles of the space). At the end of this study, two main components determining the campus plaza’s quality were found: (i) qualities of the physical environment (climatic features, location of plaza, its relation with the surrounding structuring, pedestrian / vehicle relation in terms of accessibility, fixed elements / equipment in the area, quality of open space area, quality of landscape accessory and area’s being in good repair) (ii) user characteristics. User characteristics also comprised two quality criteria: (i) the behavioural and functional quality, (ii) the visual quality.


Quality; outdoor space; campus outdoor space; plaza design criticism

Full Text:



Abu-Ghazzeh, T.M. (1999). Communicating Behavioral Research to Campus Design – Factors Affecting the Perception and Use of Outdoor Spaces at the University of Jordan, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 31, Issue 6, pp. 764-804.

Mitchell, G. (2000). Indicators as Tools to Guide Progress on the Sustainable Development Pathway, In: Lawrence, R.J. (Ed.), Sustaining Human Settlement: A Challenge for the New Millennium, Urban International Press, pp. 55-104.

Biddulph, M. (1999). Bringing Vitality to a Campus Environment, Urban Design International, 4 (3&4), pp. 153-166.

Dober, R.P. (2000). Campus Landscape: Functions, Forms, Features. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

Esin, N. and Ozsoy, A. (2003). Environmental Quality: Concepts, Contradictions, and Some Questions, Quality of Urban Life Policy Versus Practice, Edited by Nuran Zeren Gülersoy, Nur Esin, Ahsen Özsoy, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 24-32.

Gehl, J. (1987). Life Between Buildings, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.

Kamp I. Leidelmeijer K. Marsman G. Hollander A. (2003). Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-Being towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study, Landscape and Urban Planning. 65, pp. 5-18.

Koç, H. (1998). Kaliteli Yaşam Çevreleri Arayışında, Mimarlıkta Kalite, Yapı ve Yaşam 98, Kongre Kitabı, TMMOM, Mimarlar Odası Bursa Şubesi, pp. 134-148.

Mansuroglu, S. (2002). Akdeniz Uniıversitesi Ogrencilerinin Serbest Zaman Ozellikleri ve Dıs Mekan Rekreasyon Egilimlerinin Belirlenmesi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 15(2), pp. 53- 62.

Marcus, C.C. and Wischemann T. (1990). Campus Outdoor Spaces. People Places, Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. Edited by Clare Cooper Marcus and Carolyn Francis. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA. pp. 143-170.

Marcus, C.C. and Francis, C. (1990). People Places, Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. Edited by Clare Cooper Marcus and Carolyn Francis, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.

Mc Avoy, L. (2001). Outdoors for Everyone: Opportunities that Include People with Disabilities. Parks and Recreation, Vol. 36, Issue 8, pp. 24-36.

Oktay, D. (1999). Kentsel Ortak Mekânların Niteliği ve Kent Yaşamındaki Rolü. Yapı Dergisi, Vol.207, Yem Yayınevi, pp. 53-61.

Rapoport, A. (2004). Kültür, Mimarlık, Tasarım. Translation Selcuk Batur, YEM Press, Istanbul, Turkey.

Sanoff, H. (1990). Participatory Design Theory and Techniques, College of Design, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Sanoff, H. (1992). Integrating Programming, Evaluation and Participation in Design, A Theory Z Approach. Avebury Publishing, London, United Kingdom.

Smith, T. et al. (1997). Quality of an Urban Community: A Framework for Understanding the relationship between Quality and Physical Form. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 39, pp. 229-41.

Wells, M. and T. Merriman. (2002). The Outdoors and the Classroom. Parks and Recreation. Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 94-100.

Yıldız, D. and Sener, H. (2003). Factors Affecting the Use Value of Campus Outdoor Spaces. Quality of Urban Life Policy Versus Practice. Edited by Nuran Zeren Gülersoy, Nur Esin, Ahsen Özsoy, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 609-621.

Yıldız, D. and Şener, H. (2006). Binalarla Tanımlı Dıs Mekanların Kullanım Değeri Analiz Modeli, ITU Dergisi a, Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım; Cilt 5, Sayı: 1, Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 115-127.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018


Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014