EVALUATION OF USER COMFORT IN TUNNEL FORMWORK HOUSING AREAS: Izmir as a Case Study

Dilek Tezgelen, Ozgul Yilmaz Karaman

Abstract


Houses are spaces where we spend most of our lives, meeting our accommodation needs and reflecting us and our personality. The tunnel formwork systems are effective in house production. They appeal to the people in different social status varying from high-incomers to low-incomers from the city center to the peripheries of city. Based on such determination, the satisfaction of house user set forth the main line of work. For this purpose, six parameters have been ascertained to determine the user’s comfort, by interrogating the comfort of interior space in the houses: The thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort, humidity and moisture control and design quality. With the purpose of interrogating the user’s satisfaction, four mass housing areas constructed with tunnel formwork system in İzmir have been investigated. These are: Gaziemir Emlak Bankası Houses, TOKI Uzundere Houses, Mavişehir Stage I and Mavişehir Soyak Houses. After providing general information about all these mass houses, the surveys applied to the users have been evaluated. 


Keywords


tunnel formwork; housing; user comfort; user satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Christoph, M., Kunzel, H., Herkel, S., & Holm, A. (2012). Optimizing Energy Efficiency and Occupant Comfort with Climate Specific Design of the Building. Frontiers of Architectural Research(1), 229-235.

Frontczak , M., Andersen, R., & Wargocki, P. (2012). Questionnaire Survey on Factors Influencing Comfort with Indoor Environmental Quality in Danish Housing. Building and Environment(50), 56-64.

Frontczak, M., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Literature Survey on How Different Factors Influence Human Comfort in Indoor Environments. Building and Environment, 46(4), 922-937.

Guler,H. & Ülkü,S.(2007).Bitişik nizamlı villa tipi konutlarda yapısal konfor koşulları üzerine bir araştırma.Uludağ Üniversitesi Müh. Mim. Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2).

Kellekçi, Ö. L., & Berköz, L. (2006). Konut ve çevresel kalite memnuniyetini yükselten faktörler. İTÜ Dergisi/A, 5 (2), 167-178.

Koclar Oral, G., Koknel Yener, A., & Tamer Bayazit, N. (2004). Building Envelope Design with the Objective to ensure Thermal,Visual and Acoustic Comfort Conditions. Building and Environment(39), 281-287.

Manioglu, G., & Yilmaz , Z. (2006). Economic Evaluation of the Building Envelope and Operation Period of Heating System in tems of Thermal Comfort. Energy and Buildings(38), 266-272.

Oral, G. K., & Efe, A. (2010). Konutlarda enerji tasarrufu sağlamada güneş enerjisinden faydalanma. Tasarım(199), 90-93.

Pellerin, N., & Candas, V. (2003). Combined Effects of Temperature and Noise on Human Discomfort. Physiology & Behavior(78), 99– 106.

Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for Environmental Sustainability. London: Springer: Verlag London Limited.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, DOAJ, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons.

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2016

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014