FRAMEWORK FOR A CROSS-BORDER TRANSDISCIPLINARY DESIGN STUDIO EDUCATION

Rahinah Ibrahim, Renate Fruchter, Roslina Sharif

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v1i3.40

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for an architectural construction integration (A-CI) design studio curriculum in the context of an architectural graduate program. It aims to apply trans-disciplinary principles to educate competent graduates in sustainable global design-build practice. The A-CI curriculum emulates the computer-integrated Project Based Learning Laboratory (PBL) model developed at Stanford University by building on the PBL’s framework, and principles of learning and teaching professional, cultural, technological, and spatial differences amongst the building stakeholders. We extend it to include a project’s financial and regulatory decision-making process along the planning and architectural design processes at the earlier project development life-cycle phases. The paper will first present the literature review on transdisciplinary learning, followed by a description on the framework and principles of the PBL model before proposing how we extend the PBL model to integrate the early architectural design phase. The proposed program’s framework covers a four-semester curriculum at graduate level during which, students from participating universities in developing countries have the opportunity to participate in a global building project with students from participating universities in developed countries. An additional benefit of this curriculum is that it would allow students from both developing and developed countries to experience cross-border trans-disciplinary learning and teaching.

Keywords

Architectural Curriculum; Trans-disciplinary Learning; Project Based Learning; Sustainable Architecture; Integrated Design Management

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bruder, M. B. (1994). ‘Working with Members of Other Disciplines: Collaboration for Success,’ In M. Wolery and J.S. Wilbers (eds.), Including Children with Special Needs in Early Childhood Programs. National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington DC, USA, PP. 45 – 70.

Burton, R. M. & Obel, B. (2003). ‘Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application,’ Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass., USA.

Douvlou, E. (2006). ‘Effective Teaching and Learning: Integrating Problem-Based Learning in the Teaching of Sustainable Design,’ CEBE Transactions, Vol. 3 (2), PP. 23 – 37.

Fruchter, R. (1999). ‘Architecture/Engineering/ Construction Teamwork: A Collaborative Design and Learning Space,’ Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 13 (4), PP. 261-270.

Fruchter, R. (2002). ‘Global Teamwork: Crossdisciplinary, Collaborative, Geographically Distributed e-Learning Environment,’ In J. Bento, J. Duarte, M. Heitor, and W. Mitchell (eds.), Collaborative Design and Learning: Competence Building for Innovation, Quorum Books Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.

Fruchter, R. & Demian, P. (2002). ‘CoMem: Designing an Interaction Experience for Reuse of Rich Contextual Information for a Corporate Memory,’ AIEDAM Journal, Vol. 16, PP. 127 – 147.

Fruchter, R. & Emery, K. (1999). ‘CDL: CrossDisciplinary Learning Metrics and Assessment Method,’ In Proceeding of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference. Stanford University, PP. 357 – 364.

Fruchter, R. & Lewis, S. (2003). ‘Mentoring Models,’ International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Vol. 19 (5), PP. 663-671.

Fruchter, R. & Yen, S. (2000). ‘RECALL in Action,’ In R. Fruchter and F. Pena-Mora (eds.), In Proceedings of ASCE ICCCBE-VIII Conference, Stanford University.

Fruchter, R., Zitterbart, M., Pehrson, B. & Effelsbert, W. (2003). Mobile learners in dSpace, Final Project Report, Wallenberg Global Learning Network, SCIL, Stanford University.

Fruchter, R. (2005). ‘Degrees of Engagement,’ International Journal of AI & Society, Vol. 19, PP. 8-21.

Fruchter, R., & Chao, Y.C. (2004). ‘AEC Global Teamwork: Emergent Work

Processes,’ In Proceedings of ICCCBE-X. Weimar.

Fruchter, R. (2003). ‘Innovation in Engaging Learning and Global Teamwork Experiences,’ In I. Flood (ed.), In Proceedings of Computing in Civil Engineering Conference in conjunctions with ASCE National Convention, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Johanson, B., Fox, A. and Winograd T. (2002). ‘The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms,’ IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 1 (2), PP. 67-75.

Ibrahim, R. (2005). Discontinuity in organizations: Impact of knowledge flows on organizational performance, PhD. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.

Ibrahim, R. and Paulson, B. C. Jr. (2005). Discontinuity in Organizations: How Environmental Characteristics Contribute to the Project’s Knowledge Loss phenomenon, CRGP Working Paper, Vol. 12, Stanford University.

Ibrahim, R. (1999). ‘Malaysianising the Industrialized Building System: Towards a Cultural Engineered Industrialized Building System,’ In Proceedings of the World Engineering Congress and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, PP. 49-53.

Ibrahim, R. and Sumarni, I. (1999). ‘Modular Coordination: A Design Guide Towards Open Building System in Malaysia,’ In Proceeding of the World Engineering Congress and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, PP. 19-23.

Master Builders Association Malaysia (MBAM) (2004). ‘The Presidents and CEOs Roundtable 2004,’ Master Builders Journal, Vol. 3, PP. 34-3.

Öztürk, M. N. and Türkkan, E. E. (2006). ‘The Design Studio as Teaching/Learning Medium — A ProcessBased Approach,’ International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 25 (1), PP. 96–104.

Mills, B. (2006). Problem-Based Learning: The Higher Education Academy, Available online http://www.csap.bham.ac.uk/resources/project_reports/ShowOverview.asp?id=4. Accessed on April 15, 2006.

Nicolescu, B. (1996). La Transdisciplinarité: International Congress What university for Tomorrow? Towards a Transdisciplinary Evolution of the University, Available online http://perso.club-internet.fr/nicol/ciret. Accessed on December 10, 2005.

Ping Ho, S. and Liang, Y.L. (2003). ‘How to Evaluate and Invest in Emerging A/E/C Technologies Under Uncertainty,’ ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129 (1), PP. 16-24.

Reed, W. and Gordon, E. (2000). ‘Integrated Design and Building Process: What Research and Methodologies Are Needed,’ Building Research and Information, Vol. 28 (5/6), PP. 325-337.

Roberts, A. (2004). ‘Problem Based Learning and the Design Studio,’ CEBE Transactions, Vol. 1 (2), PP. 1-3.

Rowe, P. (2002). ‘Professional Design Education and Practice,’ In A. Salama, W. O’Reilly and K.

Noschis (eds.), Architectural Education Today: CrossCultural Perspectives, Comportements, Lausanne, Switzerland, PP. 25-29.

Seaton, A. (2002). ‘Reforming the Hidden Curriculum: The Key Abilities Model and Four Curricular Forms,’ Curriculum Perspectives, Vol. 22 (1), PP. 9-15. (Online) http://www.andrewseaton.com.au/reform.htm.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014