A CASE AGAINST THE MODERNIST REGIME IN DESIGN EDUCATION

Jan Michl

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i2.408

Abstract

The article argues that the present dominance of the modernist design idiom, and the general aesthetic inferiority of existing non-modernist stylistic alternatives, is a consequence of the fact that design schools have for decades banished non-modernist visual idioms from their curricula. The author discusses original arguments for the single-style / single taste modernist regime of contemporary design schools, and contends that the modernist vision of a single unified style, which prompted the banishment, was rooted in a backward-looking effort to imitate the aesthetic unity of pre-industrial, aristocratic epochs. Against the received view of modernism as an expression of modernity, the author argues that the modernists were, on the contrary, intent on suppressing the key novel feature of the modern time: its pluralism in general and its aesthetic diversity in particular. It is further asserted that the design philosophy behind the modernist regime was largely self-serving, aimed at securing the modernists an educational and aesthetic monopoly. The author pleads for transforming the modernist design education into a modern one, where a pluralism of aesthetic idioms and positions replaces the current one-style-fits-all approach.


Keywords

design history; design pedagogy; modernist design theory; stylistic diversity; modernism; historicism; styles

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ackerman, J. (1994). Transactions in architectural design. In Distance points: Essays in theory and Renaissance art and architecture (pp.23-36). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Adam, R. (1988). The paradox of imitation and originality. Architectural Design, 9/10, 18-19.

Adam, R. (1991). Tin gods. In A. Papadakis, & J. Steele (eds.), A decade of architectural design (pp. 50-65). London, UK: Academy Press.

Adam, R. (2003). Does the heritage dogma destroy living history? Context Magazine, May 2003. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.ihbc.org.uk/context_archive/79/dogma/adam.html

Adam, R. (2008). The idiot's guide to architecture. Building.co.uk, December 12. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.building.co.uk/the-idiot%E2%80%99s-guide-to-architecture/3129647.article

Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. Berkeley, CA: Center for Environmental Structure.

Alexander, C. (2002). The phenomenon of life: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe, Nature of order Bk. 1. Berkeley, CA: Center for Environmental Structure.

Alexander, C. (2004). The luminous ground: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe, Nature of order Bk. 4. Berkeley, CA: Center for Environmental Structure.

Allsopp, B. (1974). Towards a humane architecture. London, UK: Frederick Muller.

Ames Jr., A. (1949). Architectural form and visual sensations. In T. H. Creighton (Ed.), Building for modern man: A symposium (pp. 82-88). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.archive.org/stream/buildingformoder011531mbp/buildingformoder011531mbp_djvu.txt

Barnes, J. F., and Reinecke, J. O. (1938). Does It Sell? Art and Industry, 24, 146-150.

Bell, Q. (1976). On human finery (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Schocken Books.

Bernstein, A. (2005). The capitalist manifesto: The historic, economic and philosophic case for laissez-faire. Lanham, MD; Oxford: University Press of America.

Blake, P. (1977). Form follows fiasco: Why modern architecture hasn't worked. Toronto, Canada: Little, Brown and Company.

Blake, P. (1993). No place like utopia: Modern architecture and the company we kept. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

Bonta, J. P. (1979). Architecture and its interpretation: A study of expressive systems in architecture. London, UK: Lund Humphries.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. (R. Nice, Trans.). London and New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Brolin, B. C. (1976). The failure of modern architecture. London, UK: Studio Vista.

Brolin, B. C. (1985). Flight of fancy: The banishment and return of ornament. London, UK: Academy Editions.

Brolin, B. C. (2000). Architectural ornament: Banishment and return. New York, NY: Norton.

Giedion, S. (1949). The need for a basic reform in architectural education. In T. H. Creighton (ed.), Building for modern man: A symposium (pp.118-24). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.archive.org/stream/buildingformoder011531mbp/buildingformoder011531mbp_djvu.txt

Gilder, G. (1981). Wealth and poverty. Toronto, Canada: Bantam Books.

Gropius, W. (1935). The new architecture and the Bauhaus. (P. M. Shand, Trans.). London, UK: Faber & Faber.

Henningsen, P. (1984). Skal vi oppgi nutiden? [1967] Poul Henningsen om smag, stil og kunst (pp. 169-170). København: Rhodos Paperbacks.

Herdeg, K. (1983). The decorated diagram: Harvard architecture and the failure of the Bauhaus legacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hitchcock, H-R., and Johnson, P. (1932). The International Style: Architecture since 1922. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

Horáček, M. (2014). Death wish: The end of style and the historiography of architecture. In A. Lepine, M. Lodder & R. McKever (eds.), Revival: Memories, identities, utopias. London: Courtauld Books Online (forthcoming).

Hubbard, W. (1980). Complicity and conviction: Steps towards an architecture of convention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Jencks, C. (1969). Semiology and architecture. In G. Broadbent, R. Bunt, & C. Jencks (Eds.), Signs, symbols and architecture. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Jencks, C. (1980). Modern movements in architecture. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Kellow, P. (2006). The ideology of architecture. INTBAU, 1,15. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://intbau.org/archive/essay15.htm

Krier, L. (1998). Architecture: Choice or fate. Windsor, Berks, UK: Andreas Papadakis.

Krier, L. (2008). The architectural tuning of settlements. London, UK: The Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment.

Lawson, B. (1990). How designers think: The design process demystified (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth Architecture.

Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

Lewis, M. J. (2004). All sail, no anchor': Architecture after modernism. In R. Kimball, & Kramer H. (eds.), Lengthened shadows: America and its institutions in the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books.

Jones, P. L. (1969). The failure of basic design. Leonardo 2, 155-60.

Jones, P. L. (1983). The death of abstraction: Scientific metaphors in twentieth-century art and design. In M. Pollock (ed.), Common denominators in art and science (pp.149-63). Aberdeen, UK: Aberdeen University Press.

Mehaffy, M. 2003. Notes toward an updated critical theory of modernism. INTBAU, 1, 6 Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.intbau.org/archive/essay6.htm

Meyer, H. (1975). The new world [1926]. In T. and C. Benton, & D. Sharp (eds.), Form and function: A source book for the history of architecture and design 1890-1939 (pp. 106-09). London: Crosby Lockwood Staples.

Michl, J. (1995). Form follows WHAT? The modernist notion of function as a carte blanche. 1:50 - Magazine of the Faculty of Architecture & Town Planning 10, 31-20. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://janmichl.com/eng.fff-hai.html

Michl, J. (2002). On seeing design as redesign: An exploration of a neglected problem in design education. Scandinavian Journal of Design History 12, 7-23 Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.designaddict.com/essais/michl.html

Michl, J. (2014). Taking down the Bauhaus wall: Living design history as a tool for better design. The Design Journal, 17, 445-454. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://janmichl.com/eng.livingdesign.html

Millais, M. (2009). Exploding the myth of modern architecture. London, UK: Frances Lincoln.

Mumford, L. (1964). The case against 'modern architecture'. In The highway and the city (pp. 162-75). New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Muthesius, H. (1964[1927]). Die neue Bauweise. In J. Posener (ed.), Anfänge des Funktionalismus (pp. 228-9). Berlin Frankfurt /M Wien: Ullstein.

Neumann, E. (ed.). (1970). Bauhaus and Bauhaus people: Personal opinions and recollections of former Bauhaus members and their contemporaries. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1977[1966]). Intentions in architecture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Petroski, H. (1992). The evolution of useful things. New York, NY: Knopf.

Posener, J. (1976). Critique of the criticism of Functionalism. Lotus Int., 11, 5-11.

Pye, D. (1964). The nature of design. London, New York, NY: Studio Vista, Reinhold Book Corporation.

Pye, D. (1978). The nature and aesthetics of design. London, UK: The Herbert Press.

Rittel, H. W., & Webber M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science 4, 155-69.

Rybczynski, W. (1986). Home: A short history of an idea. London, UK: Heinemann.

Salama, A. M. and Wilkinson N. (2007). Design studio pedagogy: Horizons for the future. Gateshead, UK: The Urban International Press.

Salingaros, N. A., and Alexander C. (2004). Anti-architecture and deconstruction. Solingen, Germany: Umbau-Verlag.

Salingaros, N. A. et al. (2005). Principles of urban structure: Design, science, planning. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Techne.

Salingaros, N. A., and Mehaffy M. W. (2006). A theory of architecture. Solingen, Germany: Umbau-Verlag.

Salingaros, N. A. (2013). Unified architectural theory: Form, language, complexity. Kathmandu: Vajra Books.

Scruton, R. (1979). The aesthetics of architecture. London.

Silber, J. (2007). Architecture of the absurd: How "Genius" disfigured a practical art. New York, NY: Quantuck Lane.

Tzonis, A. (1972). Towards a non-oppressive environment. Boston, MA: I Press.

Watkin, D. (1977). Morality and architecture: The development of a theme in architectural history and theory from the Gothic Revival to the Modern Movement. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

Watkin, D. (2001). Morality and architecture revisited. London, UK: John Murray.

Wolfe, T. (1981). From Bauhaus to our house. New York, NY: Pocket Books.

Wright, F. L. (1931). The passing of the cornice. In Modern architecture: Being the Kahn lectures for 1930 (pp. 47-62). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Zeisel, E. (1984). On being a designer. In Eva Zeisel: Designer for industry (pp. 73-104). Montréal, Canada: Le Château Dufresne.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014