Graham Brewer, Aiobheann McVeigh



The literature is replete with accounts of the struggle to effectively target and deploy postdisaster aid so as to achieve maximum benefit to recipients, both direct and indirect, over the short- and longer-term. Generally these stories balance success with lessons learned from failure, in order to inform practice in future recovery and reconstruction events. They are often derived from the heroic accounts of key actors in case studies, on the understandable basis that these carefully selected individuals will have been pivotal in designing and directing the implementation of aid programmes. The influence of non-humans such as organisations, systems, processes, or elements of the constructed environment are considered only insofar as they impact upon the experiences of the raconteurs. However actor network theory, a technique originally developed to examine phenomena at the sociotechnological interface, ascribes human characteristics such as motives and behaviours equally to human and non-human actants, ultimately to better explain the worldly consequences of their interaction. This paper reports on the ex post application of ANT to data collected in an earlier actor-centric study, to both evaluate its usefulness in disaster research and to identify potential gaps in the disaster research agenda.


disaster; resilience; vulnerability; actor network theory

Full Text:



Aanestad, M., and Hanseth, O. (2000). “Implementing Open Network Technologies in Complex Work Practices: A Case from Telemedicine,” in Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, R. Baskerville, J.Stage, and J. I.DeGross (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 355-369.

Bingham, N. (1996). Object-ions: from technological determinism towards geographies of relations. Environment and Planning D, 14, 635-658.

Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. Callon, M., Law, J. & Rip, A. eds. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan Press, 1986 p. 19-34.

Callon, M., Law, J. & Rip, A. eds. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: Macmillan Press.

Cavill, S. and Sohail, M. (2007). Increasing Strategic Accountability: A Framework for International NGOs, Development in Practice, 17(2), pp. 231-248.

Czarniawska, B. & Hernes, T. eds (2005). Actor-Network Theory and Organizing. Copenhagen Business School Press. ISBN 8763001446

Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge.

Furedi, F. (2007). The Changing Meaning of Disaster, Area; Journal of the Royal Geographical Society, 39(4), pp. 482-489.

Goguen, J.A. (1999), Art and the Brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6/7), June/July.

Hanseth, O and Monteiro, E. (1998) Changing irreversible networks. In Proceedings from ECIS '98, Aix-en-Provence, 4.-6. June, 1998.

Hitchings, R. (2003). People, plants and performance: on actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden. Social & Cultural Geography, 4(1), 99-114.

Ingram, J.C., Franco, G., Rio, C.R. and Khazai, B. (2006), Post-disaster Recovery Dilemmas: Challenges in Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Needs for Vulnerability Reduction, Environmental Science & Policy, 9(7/8), pp. 607-613.

James, E. (2008), Managing Humanitarian Relief: An Operational Guide for NGOs, Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd, Warwickshire.

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1991). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

McVeigh, A. (2012) The impact of disaster response actors on vulnerability reduction and building community resilience. Unpublished dissertation MSc in Construction and Project Management. Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(3), 170-195

Munro, R. (2009). Actor-network theory. The Sage handbook of power,125-139.

O'Hare, G. and Rivas, S. (2005), The Landslide Hazard and Human Vulnerability in La Paz City, Bolivia, The Geographical Journal, 171(3), pp. 239-258.

Sidorova, A., & Sarker, S. (2000) Unearthing Some Causes of BPR Failure: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, CA.

Twigg, J. and Steiner, D. (2002), Mainstreaming Disaster Mitigation: Challenges to Organisational Learning in NGOs, Development in Practice, 12(4), pp. 473-479.

Utsey, S.O., Bolden, M.A., Lanier, Y. & Williams III, O. (2007). Examining the role of culture-specific opening as a predictor of resilience outcomes in African Americans from high-risk urban communities. The Journal of Black Psychology. 33(1). pp75-93.

Van House, N, (2001). Whom Do You Trust? Digital Libraries as Boundaries and Boundary Objects. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), Cambridge, MA.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018


Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014