UNESCO TO BLAME: Reality or Easy Escape?

Anna Pereira Roders, Anna Beatriz Grigolon

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.681

Abstract

“UNESCO to blame” is a trend often observed in scholarly works. In those studies UNESCO is accused to privilege Eurocentric standards on heritage conservation. Is this reality or an easy escape? Can this trend be noted in other UNESCO reference texts? This article seeks to answer this question by studying the two main inscription-based conventions and their contribution to heritage management, while performing a data analysis on the countries behind these conventions, and their roles over time. The 1972 World Heritage Convention and the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage are, therefore, taken as case studies. Based on the results, this paper elaborates on a critical analysis, distinguishing what UNESCO, as well as, Europe can eventually be blamed for and what may be used by the countries as an easy escape. This paper ends setting a research agenda to raise awareness and generate factual knowledge on the role of supranational governance in setting standards in global ethics, in particular, to guideline heritage conservation.

Keywords

UNESCO; supranational governance; conventions; world heritage; intangible heritage

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agnoletti, M. (2014). Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126: 66-73.

Albert, M.T. (2012). Perspectives of World Heritage: towards future-oriented strategies with the five ‘Cs’, World Heritage Papers, 31: 32-38. http://whc.unesco.org/documents/publi_wh_papers_31_en.pdf, Accessed on, 15/01/2015.

Beazley, O. and Deacon, H. (2007). The Safeguarding of Intangible Heritage values under the World Heritage Convention: Auschwitz, Hiroshima and Robben Island. In J.E. Blake (ed.) Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage - Challenges and Approaches -. Institute of Art and Law: Builth Wells: (pp. 93-107).

Byrne, D. (2008). Western Hegemony in Archaeological Heritage Management. In: Fairclough, G., Harrison, R., Jameson Jr. J.H., and Schofield, J. (Eds.) The Heritage Reader, (pp. 229–234). London: Routledge.

Cameron, C. (2009). Context of the World Heritage Convention: key decisions and emerging concepts. Keynote speech delivered at the workshop on Reflections on the Future of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO, February 25–27: 2009.

Cameron, C. and Rossler, M. (2014). Many voices, One Vision: The Early Years of the World Heritage Convention, Farnham: Ashgate.

Cremer, M. and Mors, S. (2013). The Dwarfing of Europe? Vol. 1 - Perspectives from the Balkans, Belarus, the Middle East and Asia, Amsterdam (Eds). http://www.culturalfoundation.eu/library/dwarfing-1, Access date, 15/01/2015.

De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive Construction of National Identities. Discourse and Society, 10(2): 149–173.

During, R. (2010). Cultural heritage discourses an Europeanisation: Discursive embedding of cultural heritage in Europe of the Regions. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.

Fobes, J. E. (1981). Is Unesco to Blame?, The New York Times, August 19, 1981, http://www.nytimes.com/1981/08/19/opinion/is-unesco-to-blame.html, Access date, 18/01/2015.

Hoggart, R. (2011). An idea and its servants: UNESCO from within. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.

Jokilehto, J. (2011). World heritage: observations on decisions related to cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 1: 61–74.

Labadi, S. (2007). Representations of the nation and cultural diversity in discourses on World Heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology, 7(2): 147-170.

Meskell, L. M. (2011). From Paris to Pontdrift: UNESCO meetings, Mapungubwe and mining. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 66: 149–156.

Meskell, L.M. (2012). The rush to inscribe: reflections on the 35th Session of the World Heritage Committee, UNESCO Paris, 2011, Journal of Field Archaeology, 37: 145–151.

Meskell, L.M. (2013). UNESCO’s World Heritage Convention at 40: Challenging the Economic and Political Order of International Heritage Conservation, Current Anthropology, 54(4): 483-494.

Nagaoka, M. (2015). ‘European’ and ‘Asian’ approaches to cultural landscapes management at Borobudur, Indonesia in the 1970s. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(3): 232-249.

Pavone, V. (2008). From the labyrinth of the world to the paradise of the heart: science and humanism in UNESCO’s approach to globalization, New York: Lexington.

Pickard, R. (2001). Policy and Law in Heritage Conservation. London: Spon Press, Taylor and Francis.

Rao, K. (2010) A new paradigm for the identification, nomination and inscription of properties on the World Heritage List. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16: 161–172.

Sajeva, S. (2006). A Case of Sustainable Conservation. In: Brebbia, C.A. Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture (Ed.), X: 187-196. Wessex Institute of Technology.

Siim, M. (2011). Evaluation of the global strategy and the PACT Initiative, letter to the director of the World Heritage Centre from the Estonian delegation, August 8, 2011.

Singh, J. P. (2011). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Creating norms for a complex world. London: Routledge.

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. London: Routledge.

Smith, L. (2012). Discourses of heritage: implications for archaeological community practice. Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos, Available at http://nuevomundo.revues.org/64148 (Accessed on 25 September 2014).

Stoczkowski, W. (2009) UNESCO’s doctrine of human diversity: a secular soteriology? Anthropology Today, 25: 7–11.

Taylor, K. (2009). Cultural Landscapes and Asia: Reconciling International and Southeast Asian Regional Values. Landscape Research, 34(1): 7–31.

UNESCO (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/, Accessed on, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/en/convention, Accessed on, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2011a). Evaluation of the global strategy and the PACT initiative (WHC-11/35.COM/9A), May 27. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO (2011b). Independent external evaluation of UNESCO. Doc. 36 C/28 (35 C/Resolution 102, 185 EX/Decision 18, 186 EX/Decision 17). Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO (2014). UNESCO Official World Heritage List Statistics, UNESCO, Paris: UNESCO, http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/stat, Access date, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2015a). Introducing UNESCO, Paris: UNESCO, http://en.unesco.org/about-us/introducing-unesco (Accessed on 15/01/2015).

UNESCO (2015b). UNESCO - Member states, Paris: UNESCO, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/member-states/countries/, Access date, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2015c). 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention – States Parties, Paris: UNESCO, http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/, Access date, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2015d). 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention – States Parties, Paris: UNESCO, http://www.unesco.org/eri/la/convention.asp?KO=17116&language=E, Access date, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2015e). States Parties and mandates to the Committee, UNESCO, Paris: UNESCO, http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/stat/, Access date, 15/01/2015.

UNESCO (2015f.) Definitions of Conventions, Recommendations and Declarations, Paris: UNESCO.

Valderrama, F. (1995) A history of UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO.

Von Droste, B. (2012). World Heritage and globalization: UNESCO’s contribution to the development of global ethics, World Heritage papers 31: 11-15. http://whc.unesco.org/documents/publi_wh_papers_31_en.pdf, Access date, 15/01/2015.

Willems, W.J. H. (2014). The Future of World Heritage and the Emergence of Transnational Heritage Regimes, Heritage & Society, 7(2, October 17): 105–20.

Winter, T. (2014). Heritage conservation futures in an age of shifting global power. Journal of Social Archaeology, 0(0): 1-21.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014