A Conceptual Framework of Immersive Shared Environments Emphasizing Social Interaction

Mi Jeong Kim, So Yun Park, Xiangyu Wang

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i3.764


The effectiveness of visual displays has often been linked to the sense of presence embodied by immersive visualization. However, efforts analyzing how presence is associated with multi-users’ quality of communication, including visualization capabilities to assist in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC), are still unfolding. This research is an exploratory study on social interaction, which aims to improve the presentation and communication of complex data through immersive simulation techniques. This paper reviews key concepts such as presence and immersion to identify factors that influence communication in the representative literature. It then introduces the Hub for Immersive Visualization and eResearch (HIVE) with a focus on the technological components. Finally it presents a conceptual framework of immersive shared environment, which enables multi-users to understand how to implement social interaction in a system efficiently or to determine whether a visualization system could support communication effectively. Future studies to validate the proposed framework are discussed, particularly in the context of cognitive factors in a shared environment.


Social Interaction; Presence; Immersion; Visualization System; Shared Environment; Communication

Full Text:



Arns, L., Cook, D. and Cruz-Neira, C. (1999). The Benefits of Statistical Visualisation in an Immersive Environment. IEEE Virtual Reality 1999. pp.88-95

Bystrom, K.-E., Barfield, W. and Hendrix, C. (1994). A Conceptual Model of the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8 (2), 241-244.doi:10.1162/105474699566107.

Ciolek, T. (1982). Zones of Co-presence in Face-to-Face Interaction: Some Observational Data. Man-Environment Systems 12 (6), 223-242.

Dourish, P. and Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group. ACM CHI 1992, Monterey, CA, USA. pp.541-547

Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Press.

Gruchalla, K. (2004). Immersive Well-path Editing: Investigating the Added Value of Immersion. IEEE Virtual Reality 2004. pp.157-164

Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (2), 262-271.

Hendrix, C. and Barfield, W. (1996a). Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 5 (3), 247-289.

Hendrix, C. and Barfield, W. (1996b). The Sense of Presence within Auditory Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 5 (3), 290-301.

Kuwabara, K., et al. (2002). Connectedness Oriented Communication: Fostering a Sense of Connectedness to Augment Social Relationships. IPSJ Journal 43 (11), 3270-3279.doi: 10.1109/SAINT.2002.994476.

Loimis, J. M. (1992). Distal Attribution and Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (1), 113-119.

Nowak, K. (2001). Defining and Differentiating Copresence, Social Presence and Presence as Transportation. Presence 2001, the 4th Annual International Workshop, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Rettie, R. (2003). Connectedness, awareness and social presence. The 6th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Aalborg, Denmark

Rokita, P. (1996). Generating Depth of Field Effects in Virtual Reality Applications. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 16 (2), 18-21.doi: 10.1109/38.486676.

Schubert, T., Friedmann, F. and Regenbrecht, H. (1999). Embodied Presence in Virtual Environments. In B., R. P. and Neilson I. (Eds). Visual Representations and Interpretations (269-278). London: Springer-Verlag.

Schubert, T., Regenbrecht, H. and Friedmann., F. (2001). The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 (3), 266-281.

Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (1), 120-125.

Short, Williams and Christie (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley.

Slater, M. and Wilbur, S. (1997). A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6 (6), 603-616.

Stevens, B. and Jerrams-Smith, J. (2001). The Sense of Object-Presence with Projection-Augmented Models. The 1st Internation Workshop on Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, London: Springer-Verlag. pp.73-75

Stevens, B., Jerrams-Smith, J., Heathcote, D. and Callear, D. (2002). Putting the Virtual into Reality: Assessing Object-Presence with Projection-Augmented Models. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11 (1), 79-92.doi: 10.1162/105474602317343677.

Witmer, B. G. and Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 (3), 225-240.doi: 10.1162/105474698565686.

Zeltzer, D. (1992). Autonomy, Interaction and Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1 (1), 127-132.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018


Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014